linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix page pool frag allocation failure.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e3a86c32-0142-2b80-975c-9c32f6c16bb0@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:36:02 +0800
From:   Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To:     Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <gakula@...vell.com>,
        <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <hawk@...nel.org>, <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix page pool frag allocation
 failure.

On 2023/10/9 11:25, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> Since page pool param's "order" is set to 0, will result
> in below warn message if interface is configured higher

interface is configured with higher rx buffer size?
                        ^^^^

> rx buffer size.
> 
> Steps to reproduce the issue.
> 1. devlink dev param set pci/0002:04:00.0 name receive_buffer_size \
>    value 8196 cmode runtime
> 2. ifconfig eth0 up
> 
> [   19.901356] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   19.901361] WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 12331 at net/core/page_pool.c:567 page_pool_alloc_frag+0x3c/0x230
> [   19.901449] pstate: 82401009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO -DIT +SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [   19.901451] pc : page_pool_alloc_frag+0x3c/0x230
> [   19.901453] lr : __otx2_alloc_rbuf+0x60/0xbc [rvu_nicpf]
> [   19.901460] sp : ffff80000f66b970
> [   19.901461] x29: ffff80000f66b970 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
> [   19.901464] x26: ffff800000d15b68 x25: ffff000195b5c080 x24: ffff0002a5a32dc0
> [   19.901467] x23: ffff0001063c0878 x22: 0000000000000100 x21: 0000000000000000
> [   19.901469] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff00016f781000 x18: 0000000000000000
> [   19.901472] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
> [   19.901474] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff0005ffdc9c80 x12: 0000000000000000
> [   19.901477] x11: ffff800009119a38 x10: 4c6ef2e3ba300519 x9 : ffff800000d13844
> [   19.901479] x8 : ffff0002a5a33cc8 x7 : 0000000000000030 x6 : 0000000000000030
> [   19.901482] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000a20
> [   19.901484] x2 : 0000000000001080 x1 : ffff80000f66b9d4 x0 : 0000000000001000
> [   19.901487] Call trace:
> [   19.901488]  page_pool_alloc_frag+0x3c/0x230
> [   19.901490]  __otx2_alloc_rbuf+0x60/0xbc [rvu_nicpf]
> [   19.901494]  otx2_rq_aura_pool_init+0x1c4/0x240 [rvu_nicpf]
> [   19.901498]  otx2_open+0x228/0xa70 [rvu_nicpf]
> [   19.901501]  otx2vf_open+0x20/0xd0 [rvu_nicvf]
> [   19.901504]  __dev_open+0x114/0x1d0
> [   19.901507]  __dev_change_flags+0x194/0x210
> [   19.901510]  dev_change_flags+0x2c/0x70
> [   19.901512]  devinet_ioctl+0x3a4/0x6c4
> [   19.901515]  inet_ioctl+0x228/0x240
> [   19.901518]  sock_ioctl+0x2ac/0x480
> [   19.901522]  __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x564/0xe50
> [   19.901525]  invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x58/0xf0
> [   19.901529]  do_el0_svc+0x58/0x150
> [   19.901531]  el0_svc+0x30/0x140
> [   19.901533]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0xe8/0x114
> [   19.901535]  el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4
> [   19.901537] ---[ end trace 678c0bf660ad8116 ]---
> 
> Fixes: b2e3406a38f0 ("octeontx2-pf: Add support for page pool")
> Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
> 
> ---
> ChangeLog
> 
> v1 -> v2: Removed PAGE_ALIGN.
> v0 -> v1: Used get_order() and PAGE_ALIGN. Fixed commit message
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
> index 997fedac3a98..83a1a460caed 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
> @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ int otx2_pool_init(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, u16 pool_id,
>  	struct page_pool_params pp_params = { 0 };
>  	struct npa_aq_enq_req *aq;
>  	struct otx2_pool *pool;
> -	int err;
> +	int err, sz;
>  
>  	pool = &pfvf->qset.pool[pool_id];
>  	/* Alloc memory for stack which is used to store buffer pointers */
> @@ -1403,6 +1403,8 @@ int otx2_pool_init(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, u16 pool_id,
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> +	sz = ALIGN(SKB_DATA_ALIGN(buf_size), OTX2_ALIGN);

Is the above really needed if PAGE_SIZE is bigger than SMP_CACHE_BYTES
or OTX2_ALIGN? Doesn't get_order() already ensure that the alignment is bigger
than SMP_CACHE_BYTES or OTX2_ALIGN?

> +	pp_params.order = get_order(sz);
>  	pp_params.flags = PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG | PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP;
>  	pp_params.pool_size = min(OTX2_PAGE_POOL_SZ, numptrs);
>  	pp_params.nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>