linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/resctrl: Non-contiguous bitmasks in Intel CAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231009124033.GBZSP0wcAT494wHWqG@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2023 14:40:33 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc:     Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/resctrl: Non-contiguous bitmasks in Intel CAT

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> This work conflicts with Babu's series [1] that is also ready for inclusion.
> We could wait for outcome of next level review to determine who will need

Who is "next level review"?

> to rebase. It may help to provide a snippet of the conflict resolution
> in anticipation of Babu's series being merged first (I will propose exactly
> the same to Babu for the scenario of this work merged first).

Just lemme know which ones I should merge first and the others can be
rebased on top.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette