[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0587b6f5-51d7-4d5a-9114-6c836b12f6f9@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 08:32:07 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
<fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <corbet@....net>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/resctrl: Non-contiguous bitmasks in Intel CAT
Hi Boris,
On 10/9/2023 5:40 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> This work conflicts with Babu's series [1] that is also ready for inclusion.
>> We could wait for outcome of next level review to determine who will need
>
> Who is "next level review"?
This is just a term I made up for when a series is deemed ready to be
considered for inclusion by x86 maintainer team.
>> to rebase. It may help to provide a snippet of the conflict resolution
>> in anticipation of Babu's series being merged first (I will propose exactly
>> the same to Babu for the scenario of this work merged first).
>
> Just lemme know which ones I should merge first and the others can be
> rebased on top.
I believe that Babu's series is ready for inclusion and can be merged first.
It is at:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231003235430.1231238-1-babu.moger@amd.com/
Maciej is already planning to send a new version of this series and can
rebase on top of Babu's work at that time.
Thank you very much.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists