[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 01:35:22 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
CC: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/7] gpio: update i.MX93/8ULP and support i.MX95
Hi Shawn,
> Subject: [PATCH v5 0/7] gpio: update i.MX93/8ULP and support i.MX95
GPIO maintainers has picked up patch 1-5, would you pick patch 6,7?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> From hardware perspective:
> - i.MX8ULP/93 GPIO supports two interrupts, 1st for Trustzone non-secure irq,
> 2nd for Trustzone secure irq.
> - i.MX8ULP/93 only has one register base
>
> The current linux gpio-vf610.c could work with i.MX8ULP/i.MX93, it is
> because some trick did in device tree node with offset added to base:
> reg = <0x2d010080 0x1000>, <0x2d010040 0x40>; But actually the register
> base should be 0x2d010000.
>
> So i.MX8ULP/93 is not HW compatible with i.MX7ULP.
>
> i.MX93 GPIO is directly derived from i.MX8ULP, so make i.MX93 compatible
> with i.MX8ULP. i.MX95 GPIO is same as i.MX93, so also compatible with
> i.MX8ULP
>
> There maybe dtbs_check failure if only test the 1st patch. After the patchset
> applied, no failure.
>
> To make avoid break old bindings from work, update the driver to support
> both old/new bindings.
>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Add R-b for patch 1, 2
> - Simplify code a bit more in patch 4 pPer Marco's comments
> - Update patch 5 to only drop port->sdata check, since patch 4 is changed.
> - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230926-vf610-gpio-v4-0-
> b57b7f6e8368@....com
>
> Changes in v4:
> Change to minItems for allOf: else: interrupts Update commit log for patch
> 4/6 Follow Marco's comments for patch 4/6 Add a new patch 5/6 Per
> Marco's comments.
>
> Changes in v3:
> Update patch v2 2/6
> Update commit log in patch v2 5/6
> Add A-b from DT maintainer for patch v2 1/6, 3/6
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230916-vf610-gpio-v2-0-
> 40823da788d7@....com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Update bindings with describe items, add one reg base for i.MX8ULP/93
> - Update driver to support one reg base, support both new/old bindings
> - Add a new patch 1 to update gpio-ranges found in dtbs_check
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914-vf610-gpio-v1-0-
> 3ed418182a6a@....com
>
> ---
> Peng Fan (7):
> dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: update gpio-ranges
> dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: correct i.MX8ULP and i.MX93
> dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: add i.MX95 compatible
> gpio: vf610: add i.MX8ULP of_device_id entry
> gpio: vf610: simplify code by dropping data check
> arm64: dts: imx8ulp: update gpio node
> arm64: dts: imx93: update gpio node
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml | 40 +++++++++++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi | 21 +++++----
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 28 +++++++-----
> drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 4 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: e143016b56ecb0fcda5bb6026b0a25fe55274f56
> change-id: 20230914-vf610-gpio-46edacd2b513
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists