[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231011083617.61bba987@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:36:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 0/6] introduce page_pool_alloc() related
API
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:11:32 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> In [1] & [2] & [3], there are usecases for veth and virtio_net
> to use frag support in page pool to reduce memory usage, and it
> may request different frag size depending on the head/tail
> room space for xdp_frame/shinfo and mtu/packet size. When the
> requested frag size is large enough that a single page can not
> be split into more than one frag, using frag support only have
> performance penalty because of the extra frag count handling
> for frag support.
>
> So this patchset provides a page pool API for the driver to
> allocate memory with least memory utilization and performance
> penalty when it doesn't know the size of memory it need
> beforehand.
Could you rebase & repost? Patches no longer apply :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists