[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdBh0k_XU3GG99EvgLOztOFWn87QXknpokcDy=29yu=Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:36:11 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Kartik <kkartik@...dia.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
keescook@...omium.org, andy@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arnd@...db.de, petlozup@...dia.com, pshete@...dia.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, frank.li@...o.com, robh@...nel.org,
stefank@...dia.com, pdeschrijver@...dia.com,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] mm/util: Introduce kmemdup_array() to duplicate an array
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:17 PM Kartik <kkartik@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce function kmemdup_array(), that will copy `n` number of
> elements from a given array `src` to `dst`.
>
> On success, kmemdup_array() returns 0 and copy the elements from `src`
> to newly allocated array `dst`, it also stores number of elements
> copied from `src` array to `dst_count` parameter. On failure, this
> returns a negative integer value containing the error value.
Hmm... Why is it so complicated?
Can it be as simple as
return kmemdup(size_mul());
?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists