lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZSb0oRABk03KOTKU@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:16:49 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the sysctl tree

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:36:12AM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:20:50PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commit is also in the block tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> > 
> >   80f3c6cfab37 ("cdrom: Remove now superfluous sentinel element from ctl_table array")
> > 
> > This is commit
> > 
> >   114b0ff62a65 ("cdrom: Remove now superfluous sentinel element from ctl_table array")
> > 
> > in the block tree.
> Is this a warning on the merge? or did it actually error out? if it is a
> wraning and one of the two was skipped, it can be safely ignored as they
> are the same. I can also remove that commit from my set and send another
> version. @luis: How do you want to handle it?

I just removed the cdrom patch from my tree.

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ