lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231011083612.4hymwsvc43hrwm6h@localhost>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:36:12 +0200
From:   Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
CC:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the sysctl tree

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:20:50PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the block tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   80f3c6cfab37 ("cdrom: Remove now superfluous sentinel element from ctl_table array")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   114b0ff62a65 ("cdrom: Remove now superfluous sentinel element from ctl_table array")
> 
> in the block tree.
Is this a warning on the merge? or did it actually error out? if it is a
wraning and one of the two was skipped, it can be safely ignored as they
are the same. I can also remove that commit from my set and send another
version. @luis: How do you want to handle it?

-- 

Joel Granados

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (660 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ