linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm2835: add a sentinel at the end of the lookup array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:45:31 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm2835: add a sentinel at the end of the lookup
 array

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 09:36:19AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 8:33 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 20:39:06 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> > [1/1] spi: bcm2835: add a sentinel at the end of the lookup array
> >       commit: 9aaa25df9b02bfe5579cbc9b4cc1177c662ec33f

> Can you provide me with an immutable branch containing commit
> 21f252cd29f08892d48739fd7513ad79c1cff96a (the one this one fixes)?

> We are very close to removing gpiochip_find() from the GPIOLIB and
> with this pulled we could remove it for v6.7.

Ugh, *please* say this sort of thing when sending patches rather than
waiting until after they've been applied.  The default is just to add
patches to the normal development branches which means they have the
whole history for the release cycle after them and may well have other
things applied on top of them before you get round to asking for them to
be applied on a different branch as is the case here.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)