lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 02:24:28 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Joey Jiao <quic_jiangenj@...cinc.com>,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        quic_jiangenj@...cinc.com, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: Add CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE option

Hi Joey,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on mcgrof/modules-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.6-rc5 next-20231012]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joey-Jiao/module-Add-CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE-option/20231011-154640
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git modules-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231011074438.6098-1-quic_jiangenj%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] module: Add CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE option
config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231013/202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231013/202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/module/main.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     547 |         val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     560 |         val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
         |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
      37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
         |                                                   ^
   In file included from kernel/module/main.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     573 |         val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
         |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
      35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
         |                                                   ^
   In file included from kernel/module/main.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     584 |         __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     594 |         __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                                                       ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     604 |         __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                                                       ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     692 |         readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     700 |         readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     708 |         readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     717 |         writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     726 |         writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     735 |         writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/module/main.c:2628:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2628 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:2637:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2637 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:2659:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2659 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:2702:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2702 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:2723:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2723 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:2756:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2756 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:2775:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2775 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:2794:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2794 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:2831:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    2831 | {
         | ^
>> kernel/module/main.c:3039:1: error: function declared in block scope cannot have 'static' storage class
    3039 | SYSCALL_DEFINE3(init_module, void __user *, umod,
         | ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:221:36: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
     221 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
         |                                    ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:230:2: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
     230 |         __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
         |         ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:247:2: note: expanded from macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
     247 |         static inline long __do_sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__));\
         |         ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3039:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
   include/linux/syscalls.h:221:36: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
     221 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
         |                                    ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:230:2: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
     230 |         __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
         |         ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:250:2: note: expanded from macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
     250 |         {                                                               \
         |         ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3041:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    3041 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3074:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    3074 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3105:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    3105 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3125:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    3125 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3153:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    3153 | {
         | ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3170:1: error: function declared in block scope cannot have 'static' storage class
    3170 | SYSCALL_DEFINE3(finit_module, int, fd, const char __user *, uargs, int, flags)
         | ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:221:36: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
     221 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
         |                                    ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:230:2: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
     230 |         __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
         |         ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:247:2: note: expanded from macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
     247 |         static inline long __do_sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__));\
         |         ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3170:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
   include/linux/syscalls.h:221:36: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
     221 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
         |                                    ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:230:2: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
     230 |         __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
         |         ^
   include/linux/syscalls.h:250:2: note: expanded from macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
     250 |         {                                                               \
         |         ^
   kernel/module/main.c:3171:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
    3171 | {
         | ^
   fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=]
   12 warnings and 20 errors generated.


vim +2628 kernel/module/main.c

34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16  2626  
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16  2627  static int may_init_module(void)
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 @2628  {
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16  2629  	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE) || modules_disabled)
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16  2630  		return -EPERM;
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16  2631  
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16  2632  	return 0;
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16  2633  }
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16  2634  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ