linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] x86/resctrl: Add comments on RFTYPE flags hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7daa9a7-6f74-44ef-80fc-d0ea013902f8@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:28:24 -0500
From:   "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To:     Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, corbet@....net,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc:     fenghua.yu@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        chang.seok.bae@...el.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
        jmattson@...gle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
        sandipan.das@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bagasdotme@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com,
        christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, jarkko@...nel.org,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
        peternewman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] x86/resctrl: Add comments on RFTYPE flags
 hierarchy

Hi Reinette,

On 10/12/23 11:01, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On 10/11/2023 9:57 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> Sure. Will remove Reviewed-by on this patch. Please let me know about
>> other patches when you get a chance.
> 
> From what I can tell, apart from moving the flags text to Documentation,
> there is only one other code related change and that is just moving the
> RFTYPE_MON_BASE definition to a later patch. That looks good to me.
> 
> The other changes are all in the commit messages and that mostly looks
> good to me ... some issues seemed to have slipped in during this version
> and I will point them out in responses to the individual patches.

Sure. Thanks
Babu Moger