[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a4e0424-5bdb-4011-a7dc-8506c609384f@rivosinc.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:25:15 +0200
From: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/13] riscv: report more ISA extensions through
hwprobe
On 12/10/2023 10:21, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 09:15:46AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
>> On second thought, maybe it would make more sense to squash all logical
>> commits together (dt-bindings, hwporobe, etc) with all the ISA
>> extensions in each. Tell me if you think it would be better.
>
> I don't think there's anything wrong with the current approach.
Hi Conor,
Ok then, let's keep like this if there are no objection, I thought it
was a bit "too many" commits just for a few lines, but at least it's
unitary.
Thanks
Clément
Powered by blists - more mailing lists