linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty: gdm724x: Match alignment with open parenthesis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231013211326.GB25352@Negi>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:13:26 -0700
From:   Soumya Negi <soumya.negi97@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Kim <jonathankim@...semi.com>,
        Dean ahn <deanahn@...semi.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty: gdm724x: Match alignment with open parenthesis

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:57:40AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:26:34AM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote:
> > Fix CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> > Issue found by checkpatch.pl
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Soumya Negi <soumya.negi97@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > index 32b2e817ff04..4e5cac76db58 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > @@ -271,8 +271,8 @@ int register_lte_tty_driver(void)
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < TTY_MAX_COUNT; i++) {
> > -		tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(GDM_TTY_MINOR,
> > -				TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW | TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV);
> > +		tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(GDM_TTY_MINOR, TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW |
> > +					      TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV);
> 
> I prefered the original code.  It was more readable.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
Hi Dan,

Noted. I'm curious what happens when some of the patches in a patchset
are acceptable and some are not. Is everything disregarded by
maintainers or are the good patches cherry-picked from the set?

Thanks,
Soumya