linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:55:26 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid
 implementation

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 17:29:22 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > The Qualcomm SPMI PMIC revid implementation is broken in multiple ways
> > that can lead to resource leaks and crashes. This series reworks the
> > implementation so that can be used safely.
> > 
> > Included is also a rename of the SPMI device lookup helper which can
> > hopefully help prevent similar leaks from being reintroduced.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix reference leaks in revid helper
>       commit: 365cf70ff33fe20e749227346d7245f7f0dccb58
> [2/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid implementation
>       commit: 7370f9de463b1d21dcdf9480a0a15babecd14ac7
> [3/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
>       commit: b5cd5e72a71e9d368e20271d3a772dd045ae220e

Thanks for picking these up, Lee. You don't seem to have pushed these
out yet so I'm not sure if you intend to send them on for 6.6-rc or
6.7-rc1 yet.

Either way, would it be possible to include also the related and
dependant spmi cleanups?

Stephen, could you ack those changes so Lee can take them as well?

Johan