linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:15:07 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid
 implementation

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Johan Hovold wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 17:29:22 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > The Qualcomm SPMI PMIC revid implementation is broken in multiple ways
> > > that can lead to resource leaks and crashes. This series reworks the
> > > implementation so that can be used safely.
> > > 
> > > Included is also a rename of the SPMI device lookup helper which can
> > > hopefully help prevent similar leaks from being reintroduced.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied, thanks!
> > 
> > [1/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix reference leaks in revid helper
> >       commit: 365cf70ff33fe20e749227346d7245f7f0dccb58
> > [2/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid implementation
> >       commit: 7370f9de463b1d21dcdf9480a0a15babecd14ac7
> > [3/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
> >       commit: b5cd5e72a71e9d368e20271d3a772dd045ae220e
> 
> Thanks for picking these up, Lee. You don't seem to have pushed these
> out yet so I'm not sure if you intend to send them on for 6.6-rc or
> 6.7-rc1 yet.

Just pushed.  Should be in -next tomorrow.

These do not fix commits from this release and I'm not planning on
sending another PR for the current rcs, so these are due for v6.7-rc1.

> Either way, would it be possible to include also the related and
> dependant spmi cleanups?

With Acks, sure.

> Stephen, could you ack those changes so Lee can take them as well?


-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]