[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b93a3e8-2d15-256a-4172-a22ef17dde9@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:39:45 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, rajvi.jingar@...ux.intel.com,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
"David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 03/16] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use cleanup.h
Hi,
I added checkpatch people, please check what looks a false positive below.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, David E. Box wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-10-12 at 13:25 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on acce85a7dd28eac3858d44230f4c65985d0f271c]
> >
> > url:
> > https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-E-Box/platform-x86-intel-vsec-Move-structures-to-header/20231012-104217
> > base: acce85a7dd28eac3858d44230f4c65985d0f271c
> > patch link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231012023840.3845703-4-david.e.box%40linux.intel.com
> > patch subject: [PATCH V3 03/16] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use cleanup.h
> > reproduce:
> > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231012/202310121314.3Xpqom2w-lkp@in
> > tel.com/reproduce)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version
> > of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > Closes:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310121314.3Xpqom2w-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > # many are suggestions rather than must-fix
> >
> > ERROR:SPACING: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
> > #31: FILE: drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c:159:
> > + struct intel_vsec_device __free(kfree) *intel_vsec_dev = NULL;
>
> These looks like false positives.
I agree. If I interpret the error message right checkpatch seems to think
that's a multiplication which is not the case here.
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists