[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4c2402f-fc81-ff54-7c5b-606fa14405e2@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 20:48:19 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>,
"Martins, Joao" <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Add helper to setup pasid nested
translation
On 2023/10/13 20:40, Yi Liu wrote:
>>
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if ((s1_cfg->flags & IOMMU_VTD_S1_SRE) && !ecap_srs(iommu-
>>>> ecap)) {
>>> + pr_err_ratelimited("No supervisor request support on %s\n",
>>> + iommu->name);
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if ((s1_cfg->flags & IOMMU_VTD_S1_EAFE) && !ecap_eafs(iommu-
>>>> ecap)) {
>>> + pr_err_ratelimited("No extended access flag support
>>> on %s\n",
>>> + iommu->name);
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
>>> + pte = intel_pasid_get_entry(dev, pasid);
>>> + if (!pte) {
>>> + spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + }
>>> + if (pasid_pte_is_present(pte)) {
>>> + spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + pasid_clear_entry(pte);
>>> +
>>> + if (s1_cfg->addr_width == ADDR_WIDTH_5LEVEL)
>>> + pasid_set_flpm(pte, 1);
>>> +
>>> + pasid_set_flptr(pte, (uintptr_t)s1_gpgd);
>>> +
>>> + if (s1_cfg->flags & IOMMU_VTD_S1_SRE) {
>>> + pasid_set_sre(pte);
>>> + if (s1_cfg->flags & IOMMU_VTD_S1_WPE)
>>> + pasid_set_wpe(pte);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (s1_cfg->flags & IOMMU_VTD_S1_EAFE)
>>> + pasid_set_eafe(pte);
>>> +
>>> + if (s2_domain->force_snooping)
>>> + pasid_set_pgsnp(pte);
>>> +
>>> + pasid_set_slptr(pte, virt_to_phys(pgd));
>>> + pasid_set_fault_enable(pte);
>>> + pasid_set_domain_id(pte, did);
>>> + pasid_set_address_width(pte, s2_domain->agaw);
>>> + pasid_set_page_snoop(pte, !!ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap));
>>> + pasid_set_translation_type(pte, PASID_ENTRY_PGTT_NESTED);
>>> + pasid_set_present(pte);
>>> + spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>
>> All changes within iommu->lock are specific to the device specific
>> PASID entry. Probably this is one potential cleanup TODO to
>> use a per-device lock instead.
>
> yeah, a separate cleanup. is it, @Baolu?
Sure. I'd like to take some time to consider this further. Please keep
it as-is for the time being.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists