linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/kvm: Fine grain _EL2 system registers list that affect nested virtualization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72b67c49-423a-e88a-62c9-6b3cc9211f88@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:54:44 +0200
From:   Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/kvm: Fine grain _EL2 system registers list
 that affect nested virtualization

Hi Miguel,

On 10/13/23 20:41, Miguel Luis wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>> On 12 Oct 2023, at 15:22, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Miguel,
>>
>> On 10/11/23 20:01, Miguel Luis wrote:
>>> Implement a fine grained approach in the _EL2 sysreg ranges.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d0fc0a2519a6 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add trap forwarding for HCR_EL2")
>>> Signed-off-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
>>> index 9ced1bf0c2b7..3af49e130ee6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
>>> @@ -648,15 +648,91 @@ static const struct encoding_to_trap_config encoding_to_cgt[] __initconst = {
>>> SR_TRAP(SYS_APGAKEYLO_EL1, CGT_HCR_APK),
>>> SR_TRAP(SYS_APGAKEYHI_EL1, CGT_HCR_APK),
>>> /* All _EL2 registers */
>>> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 0),
>>> -       sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>> I think you miss DBGVCR32_EL2
> That would be op0 == 10, which I indeed didn't considered given the ranges
> previously defined. From its pseudocode I see it would make sense only if EL1
> would support AArch32 but that seems not to be in the plans.
>
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VMPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCTLR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ACTLR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCTLR2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_HCR_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_HCRX_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SMPRIMAP_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SMCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SDER32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_TTBR0_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_TCR2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VTTBR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VTCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VNCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSTTBR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSTCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_DACR32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_HDFGRTR_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_HAFGRTR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> /* Skip the SP_EL1 encoding... */
>>> SR_TRAP(SYS_SPSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> SR_TRAP(SYS_ELR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 1),
>>> -       sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 0),
>>> -       sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + /* SPSR_irq, SPSR_abt, SPSR_und, SPSR_fiq */
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 3, 0),
>>> +       sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 3, 3), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_IFSR32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AFSR0_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AFSR1_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ESR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSESR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_TFSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_FAR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_HPFAR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>> you miss BRBCR_EL2
> Yes, definitely. Same as above, didn't considered op0 == 10, (Table D18-1).
> This one seems to me the only one missing too.

yep
>
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_PMSCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MAIR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AMAIR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAMHCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAMVPMV_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAM2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_MPAMVPM0_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_MPAMVPM7_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>> About the MPAM where did you find the pseudo code?
> The pseucode isn't available on the document. I'm following the statement when
> HCR_EL2.NV is 1, where:
>
> "The System or Special-purpose registers for which accesses are trapped and
> reported using EC syndrome value 0x18 are as follows:
> — Registers accessed using MRS or MSR with a name ending in _EL2, except, [...]"

ok thank you for the clarification. With

BRBCR_EL2 handling, feel free to add my

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>

(I guess you will handle 
DBGVCR32_EL2 in a separate patch)

Eric

>
>>> + /*
>>> +  * Note that the spec. describes a group of MEC registers
>>> +  * whose access should not trap, therefore skip the following:
>>> +  * MECID_A0_EL2, MECID_A1_EL2, MECID_P0_EL2,
>>> +  * MECID_P1_EL2, MECIDR_EL2, VMECID_A_EL2,
>>> +  * VMECID_P_EL2.
>>> +  */
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_VBAR_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_RMR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VDISR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + /* ICH_AP0R<m>_EL2 */
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_AP0R0_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_ICH_AP0R3_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + /* ICH_AP1R<m>_EL2 */
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_AP1R0_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_ICH_AP1R3_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICC_SRE_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_HCR_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_ICH_EISR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICH_ELRSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICH_VMCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + /* ICH_LR<m>_EL2 */
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_LR0_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_ICH_LR15_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_TPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCXTNUM_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + /* AMEVCNTVOFF0<n>_EL2, AMEVCNTVOFF1<n>_EL2  */
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_AMEVCNTVOFF0n_EL2(0),
>>> +       SYS_AMEVCNTVOFF1n_EL2(15), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + /* CNT*_EL2 */
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTPOFF_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHP_TVAL_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_CNTHP_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHV_TVAL_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_CNTHV_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHVS_TVAL_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_CNTHVS_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHPS_TVAL_EL2,
>>> +       SYS_CNTHPS_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> /* All _EL02, _EL12 registers */
>>> SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 5, 0, 0, 0),
>>>       sys_reg(3, 5, 10, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
>> Besides this looks good to me and to me this looks safer than the
>> previous large span approach but that's my taste ;-)
>>
> Your suggestions made total sense to me.
>
> Thanks!
> Miguel
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>