| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <15851D9D-5FF5-4900-B70F-0141B8392503@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 10:11:02 +0000
From: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/kvm: Fine grain _EL2 system registers list
that affect nested virtualization
Hi Eric,
> On 16 Oct 2023, at 09:54, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Miguel,
>
> On 10/13/23 20:41, Miguel Luis wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>>> On 12 Oct 2023, at 15:22, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Miguel,
>>>
>>> On 10/11/23 20:01, Miguel Luis wrote:
>>>> Implement a fine grained approach in the _EL2 sysreg ranges.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: d0fc0a2519a6 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add trap forwarding for HCR_EL2")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
>>>> index 9ced1bf0c2b7..3af49e130ee6 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
>>>> @@ -648,15 +648,91 @@ static const struct encoding_to_trap_config encoding_to_cgt[] __initconst = {
>>>> SR_TRAP(SYS_APGAKEYLO_EL1, CGT_HCR_APK),
>>>> SR_TRAP(SYS_APGAKEYHI_EL1, CGT_HCR_APK),
>>>> /* All _EL2 registers */
>>>> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 0),
>>>> - sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> I think you miss DBGVCR32_EL2
>> That would be op0 == 10, which I indeed didn't considered given the ranges
>> previously defined. From its pseudocode I see it would make sense only if EL1
>> would support AArch32 but that seems not to be in the plans.
>>
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VMPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCTLR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ACTLR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCTLR2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_HCR_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_HCRX_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SMPRIMAP_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SMCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SDER32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_TTBR0_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_TCR2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VTTBR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VTCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VNCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSTTBR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSTCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_DACR32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_HDFGRTR_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_HAFGRTR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> /* Skip the SP_EL1 encoding... */
>>>> SR_TRAP(SYS_SPSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> SR_TRAP(SYS_ELR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 1),
>>>> - sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 0),
>>>> - sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + /* SPSR_irq, SPSR_abt, SPSR_und, SPSR_fiq */
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 3, 0),
>>>> + sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 3, 3), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_IFSR32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AFSR0_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AFSR1_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ESR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSESR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_TFSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_FAR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_HPFAR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> you miss BRBCR_EL2
>> Yes, definitely. Same as above, didn't considered op0 == 10, (Table D18-1).
>> This one seems to me the only one missing too.
>
> yep
Thanks for confirming it!
>>
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_PMSCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MAIR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AMAIR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAMHCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAMVPMV_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAM2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_MPAMVPM0_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_MPAMVPM7_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> About the MPAM where did you find the pseudo code?
>> The pseucode isn't available on the document. I'm following the statement when
>> HCR_EL2.NV is 1, where:
>>
>> "The System or Special-purpose registers for which accesses are trapped and
>> reported using EC syndrome value 0x18 are as follows:
>> — Registers accessed using MRS or MSR with a name ending in _EL2, except, [...]"
>
> ok thank you for the clarification. With
>
> BRBCR_EL2 handling, feel free to add my
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
>
Thank you Eric!
> (I guess you will handle
> DBGVCR32_EL2 in a separate patch)
>
I think that Marc is addressing it here: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20231013223311.3950585-1-maz@kernel.org/
but I can be wrong.
Marc, could you please confirm ?
( re: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/e6f3002c10848e911c4bfee3a1d472aa@kernel.org/ )
Thank you both in advance.
Miguel
> Eric
>
>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Note that the spec. describes a group of MEC registers
>>>> + * whose access should not trap, therefore skip the following:
>>>> + * MECID_A0_EL2, MECID_A1_EL2, MECID_P0_EL2,
>>>> + * MECID_P1_EL2, MECIDR_EL2, VMECID_A_EL2,
>>>> + * VMECID_P_EL2.
>>>> + */
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_VBAR_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_RMR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VDISR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + /* ICH_AP0R<m>_EL2 */
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_AP0R0_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_ICH_AP0R3_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + /* ICH_AP1R<m>_EL2 */
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_AP1R0_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_ICH_AP1R3_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICC_SRE_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_HCR_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_ICH_EISR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICH_ELRSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICH_VMCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + /* ICH_LR<m>_EL2 */
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_LR0_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_ICH_LR15_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_TPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCXTNUM_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + /* AMEVCNTVOFF0<n>_EL2, AMEVCNTVOFF1<n>_EL2 */
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_AMEVCNTVOFF0n_EL2(0),
>>>> + SYS_AMEVCNTVOFF1n_EL2(15), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + /* CNT*_EL2 */
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTPOFF_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHP_TVAL_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_CNTHP_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHV_TVAL_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_CNTHV_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHVS_TVAL_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_CNTHVS_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHPS_TVAL_EL2,
>>>> + SYS_CNTHPS_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
>>>> /* All _EL02, _EL12 registers */
>>>> SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 5, 0, 0, 0),
>>>> sys_reg(3, 5, 10, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
>>> Besides this looks good to me and to me this looks safer than the
>>> previous large span approach but that's my taste ;-)
>>>
>> Your suggestions made total sense to me.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Miguel
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists