[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpa4Wb2fXRS52cYa4=hs-K63y_Re52tS2VJsO9A31eZeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:57:00 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] PM: domains: Drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state()
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:59, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:21:08 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > Since commit 7c41cdcd3bbe ("OPP: Simplify the over-designed pstate <-> level
> > dance"), there is no longer any users of the
> > pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() API, while a few genpd providers are still
> > assigning the redundant ->opp_to_performance_state() callback.
> >
> > Let's clean this up so we can drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() and the
> > callback too.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/5] soc/tegra: pmc: Drop the ->opp_to_performance_state() callback
> commit: cda263907a6f88c75fb97cf7adecffaafb6237ec
Thierry, I was planning to queue up the complete series through my
pmdomain tree, my apologies if that wasn't clear. I want to get rid of
the actual genpd API and the genpd callback altogether (patch5).
Would it be possible for you to drop the above patch from your tree
and provide an ack instead?
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists