linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] PM: domains: Drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:53:22 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] PM: domains: Drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state()

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 11:57, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:59, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:21:08 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > Since commit 7c41cdcd3bbe ("OPP: Simplify the over-designed pstate <-> level
> > > dance"), there is no longer any users of the
> > > pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() API, while a few genpd providers are still
> > > assigning the redundant ->opp_to_performance_state() callback.
> > >
> > > Let's clean this up so we can drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() and the
> > > callback too.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/5] soc/tegra: pmc: Drop the ->opp_to_performance_state() callback
> >       commit: cda263907a6f88c75fb97cf7adecffaafb6237ec
>
> Thierry, I was planning to queue up the complete series through my
> pmdomain tree, my apologies if that wasn't clear. I want to get rid of
> the actual genpd API and the genpd callback altogether (patch5).
>
> Would it be possible for you to drop the above patch from your tree
> and provide an ack instead?

I just noticed that the above went has also been pulled into the soc
tree from your pull-request. So nevermind, I can do the final cleanup
later on.

Kind regards
Uffe