[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231016134159.11d8f849@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 13:41:59 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the usb tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the gpio-brgl tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpio/gpio-ljca.c
between commit:
1034cc423f1b ("gpio: update Intel LJCA USB GPIO driver")
from the usb tree and commit:
da2ad5fe2292 ("gpio: ljca: Convert to platform remove callback returning void")
from the gpio-brgl tree.
I fixed it up (I just used the former version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists