linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH printk v2 1/4] printk: For @suppress_panic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZS01LOH0aJ9c8qyn@alley>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:05:48 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v2 1/4] printk: For @suppress_panic_printk check
 other panic

On Fri 2023-10-13 22:49:37, John Ogness wrote:
> Currently @suppress_panic_printk is checked along with
> non-matching @panic_cpu and current CPU. This works
> because @suppress_panic_printk is only set when
> panic_in_progress() is true.
> 
> Rather than relying on the @suppress_panic_printk semantics,
> use the concise helper function other_cpu_in_progress(). The
> helper function exists to avoid open coding such tests.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>

Best Regards,
Petr