lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 18:56:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc:     Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
        lkp@...el.com, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
        feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [drivers/char/mem]  1b057bd800:
 stress-ng.splice.ops_per_sec -99.8% regression

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:06:42PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed a -99.8% regression of stress-ng.splice.ops_per_sec on:
> 
> 
> commit: 1b057bd800c3ea0c926191d7950cd2365eddc9bb ("drivers/char/mem: implement splice() for /dev/zero, /dev/full")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> 
> testcase: stress-ng
> test machine: 64 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6346 CPU @ 3.10GHz (Ice Lake) with 256G memory
> parameters:
> 
> 	nr_threads: 100%
> 	testtime: 60s
> 	class: pipe
> 	test: splice
> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
> 
> 
> In addition to that, the commit also has significant impact on the following tests:
> 
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | testcase: change | stress-ng: stress-ng.splice.ops_per_sec 38.9% improvement                                       |

So everything now goes faster, right?  -99.8% regression means 99.8%
faster?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ