[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0091a3e7-d3cf-4572-af46-79adbde42ab8@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:41:51 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao22@...il.com>,
Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
louhongxiang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] SCSI: Fix issues between removing device and error
handle
On 10/17/23 10:00, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:04 AM Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am testing SCSI error handle with my previous scsi_debug error
>> injection patches, and found some issues when removing device and
>> error handler happened together.
>>
>> These issues are triggered because devices in removing would be skipped
>> when calling shost_for_each_device().
>
> Friendly ping...
The patch series was posted on October 15, 7 PM PDT and the ping has
been posted on October 17, 10 AM PDT. That's less than two days after
the patch series was posted. Isn't that way too soon to post a "ping"?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists