[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8877db4d-50e2-d814-484b-c2ec501f752b@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:37:52 +0800
From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Wenchao Hao <haowenchao22@...il.com>
CC: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<louhongxiang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] SCSI: Fix issues between removing device and error
handle
On 2023/10/18 5:41, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
> On 10/17/23 10:00, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:04 AM Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am testing SCSI error handle with my previous scsi_debug error
>>> injection patches, and found some issues when removing device and
>>> error handler happened together.
>>>
>>> These issues are triggered because devices in removing would be skipped
>>> when calling shost_for_each_device().
>>
>> Friendly ping...
>
> The patch series was posted on October 15, 7 PM PDT and the ping has
> been posted on October 17, 10 AM PDT. That's less than two days after
> the patch series was posted. Isn't that way too soon to post a "ping"?
>
The previous version was posted on 2023/9/28 but not reviewed, so I ping
soon after repost.
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists