linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm: memcg: add per-memcg zswap writeback stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9da3fb2-e44a-4c42-8f9f-cf24be12ccb7@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:37:57 -0700
From:   Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To:     Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <hannes@...xchg.org>, <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>,
        <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, <sjenning@...hat.com>,
        <ddstreet@...e.org>, <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>,
        <mhocko@...nel.org>, <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <kernel-team@...a.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm: memcg: add per-memcg zswap writeback stat

On 10/17/2023 4:35 PM, Nhat Pham wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:21 PM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
>>
>> Since zswap now writes back pages from memcg-specific LRUs, we now need a
>> new stat to show writebacks count for each memcg.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
> 
> /s/Signed-off/Acked
> This is Domenico's work :) I used the wrong tag here. Should be:
> Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>

no, since you are posting the patch, you have to sign off on it.
Signed-off-by is correct