linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm: memcg: add per-memcg zswap writeback stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKEwX=M3WP=awVcNRDCYWpjwBPvwdyb5NFrVXPOEzvCpqNJ-NA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:40:38 -0700
From:   Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To:     Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
        cerasuolodomenico@...il.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
        sjenning@...hat.com, ddstreet@...e.org, vitaly.wool@...sulko.com,
        mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeelb@...gle.com,
        muchun.song@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm: memcg: add per-memcg zswap writeback stat

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:38 PM Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/17/2023 4:35 PM, Nhat Pham wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:21 PM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Since zswap now writes back pages from memcg-specific LRUs, we now need a
> >> new stat to show writebacks count for each memcg.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
> >
> > /s/Signed-off/Acked
> > This is Domenico's work :) I used the wrong tag here. Should be:
> > Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
>
> no, since you are posting the patch, you have to sign off on it.
> Signed-off-by is correct
>

Ah so past Nhat was right all along. Ignore my comments then.
Thanks for letting me know, Jeff!