[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231018120744.1f17950c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:07:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the
kselftest-fixes tree
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:01:04 -0600
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
>
> Thank you Stephen.
>
> Steve, how would you like to handle this one. I am planning
> to send fix to Linus this week to be included in Linux 6.6
> in a fixes update.
Feel free to send it as you expected to. I do a merge of Linus's tree before
sending a pull request for the merge window, and report all conflicts that
occur.
Linus is good at merge conflict resolution, so this should not be a problem.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists