[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82594142-0ffa-4965-b37e-bef66cc08bfd@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:54:57 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the
kselftest-fixes tree
On 10/18/23 10:07, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:01:04 -0600
> Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>>> complex conflicts.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you Stephen.
>>
>> Steve, how would you like to handle this one. I am planning
>> to send fix to Linus this week to be included in Linux 6.6
>> in a fixes update.
>
> Feel free to send it as you expected to. I do a merge of Linus's tree before
> sending a pull request for the merge window, and report all conflicts that
> occur.
>
> Linus is good at merge conflict resolution, so this should not be a problem.
>
> -- Steve
Thank you. I will cc you when I send the pull request later on this week.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists