[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fdb2e74-2918-4cd2-bbda-f00745b03b97@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:37:09 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] slub: Introduce on_partial()
On 2023/10/17 23:54, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 03:44:35PM +0000, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
>> We change slab->__unused to slab->flags to use it as SLUB_FLAGS, which
>> now only include SF_NODE_PARTIAL flag. It indicates whether or not the
>> slab is on node partial list.
>
> This is an unnecessarily complex solution. As with the pfmemalloc bit,
> we can reuse the folio flags for a few flags. I would recommend the
> PG_workingset bit for this purpose.
>
Yeah, this is better indeed. Thanks for your suggestion!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists