[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTF2M7VeNtisGBm7@d3>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 14:32:19 -0400
From: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
George Cherian <george.cherian@...vell.com>,
Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@...vell.com>,
hariprasad <hkelam@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...dia.com>,
Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] staging: qlge: devlink health: use
retained error fmsg API
On 2023-10-19 07:42 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:28:03 -0400 Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > > Humpf. Unrelated to the set, when did qlge grow devlink support?!
> > >
> > > Coiby, do you still use this HW?
> > >
> > > It looks like the driver was moved to staging on account of being
> > > old and unused, and expecting that we'll delete it. Clearly that's
> > > not the case if people are adding devlink support, so should we
> > > move it back?
> >
> > AFAIK this was done by Coiby as an exercise in kernel programming.
> > Improving the debugging dump facilities was one of the tasks in the TODO
> > file.
> >
> > I moved the driver to staging because it had many problems and it had
> > been abandoned by the vendor. There might be some qlge users left but is
> > that reason enough to move the driver back to drivers/net/
> > if there is no one who is interested in doing more than checkpatch
> > fixes on the driver?
>
> Staging is usually an area for code entering the kernel, not leaving.
> We should either suffer with it under drivers/net/ or delete it,
> as you say, nobody is working on significant improvements so having
> the driver in staging is serving no purpose.
>
> How about we delete it completely, and if someone complains bring
> it back under drivers/net ?
That sounds like a reasonable way forward, thank you. I'll send a patch
to do the removal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists