linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 01/13] ASoC: SOF: core: Ensure sof_ops_free() is still called when probe never ran.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:02:55 +0200
From:   Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/13] ASoC: SOF: core: Ensure sof_ops_free() is still
 called when probe never ran.

Hey,

Den 2023-10-13 kl. 11:15, skrev Takashi Iwai:
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 13:54:25 +0200,
> Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> In an effort to not call sof_ops_free twice, we stopped running it when
>> probe was aborted.
>>
>> Check the result of cancel_work_sync to see if this was the case.
>>
>> Fixes: 31bb7bd9ffee ("ASoC: SOF: core: Only call sof_ops_free() on remove if the probe was successful")
>> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Your Signed-off-by tag is missing.
>
> Could you resubmit?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi

I missed this email apparently.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>

Is this enough for the tooling, or do you need an actual resubmit?

Cheers,
~Maarten

>
>> ---
>>   sound/soc/sof/core.c | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/core.c b/sound/soc/sof/core.c
>> index 2d1616b81485c..0938b259f7034 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/sof/core.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/core.c
>> @@ -459,9 +459,10 @@ int snd_sof_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>>   	struct snd_sof_dev *sdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>   	struct snd_sof_pdata *pdata = sdev->pdata;
>>   	int ret;
>> +	bool aborted = false;
>>   
>>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_PROBE_WORK_QUEUE))
>> -		cancel_work_sync(&sdev->probe_work);
>> +		aborted = cancel_work_sync(&sdev->probe_work);
>>   
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Unregister any registered client device first before IPC and debugfs
>> @@ -487,6 +488,9 @@ int snd_sof_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>>   		snd_sof_free_debug(sdev);
>>   		snd_sof_remove(sdev);
>>   		sof_ops_free(sdev);
>> +	} else if (aborted) {
>> +		/* probe_work never ran */
>> +		sof_ops_free(sdev);
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	/* release firmware */
>> -- 
>> 2.39.2
>>