lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231019132545.1190490-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:31:45 +0206
From:   John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>,
        Chunlei Wang <chunlei.wang@...iatek.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH printk v1] printk: ringbuffer: Do not skip non-finalized with prb_next_seq()

Commit f244b4dc53e5 ("printk: ringbuffer: Improve prb_next_seq()
performance") introduced an optimization for prb_next_seq() by
using best-effort to track recently finalized records. However,
the order of finalization does not necessarily match the order
of the records. This can lead to prb_next_seq() returning
higher than desired sequence numbers, which results in the
reader skipping over records that are not yet finalized. From
the reader's perspective it results in messages never being
seen.

Rather than simply tracking recently finalized records, force
the committing writer to read records and increment the last
"contiguous block" of finalized records. In order to do this,
the sequence number instead of ID must be stored because ID's
cannot be directly compared.

For 32bit systems, only the lower 32 bits of the sequence
number are stored. When reading the value, it is expanded to
the full 64bit sequence number by folding in the value
returned by prb_first_seq().

Fixes: f244b4dc53e5 ("printk: ringbuffer: Improve prb_next_seq() performance")
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h |   4 +-
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
index fde338606ce8..f9fbfa21c5b2 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1441,20 +1441,83 @@ bool prb_reserve_in_last(struct prb_reserved_entry *e, struct printk_ringbuffer
 	return false;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+
+#define __u64seq_to_ulseq(u64seq) (u64seq)
+#define __ulseq_to_u64seq(ulseq) (ulseq)
+
+#else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
+
+static u64 prb_first_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb);
+
+#define __u64seq_to_ulseq(u64seq) ((u32)u64seq)
+static inline u64 __ulseq_to_u64seq(u32 ulseq)
+{
+	u64 rb_first_seq = prb_first_seq(prb);
+	u64 seq;
+
+	/*
+	 * The provided sequence is only the lower 32 bits of the ringbuffer
+	 * sequence. It needs to be expanded to 64bit. Get the first sequence
+	 * number from the ringbuffer and fold it.
+	 */
+	seq = rb_first_seq - ((u32)rb_first_seq - ulseq);
+
+	return seq;
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
+
+static u64 desc_last_finalized_seq(struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring)
+{
+	unsigned long ulseq = atomic_long_read(&desc_ring->last_finalized_seq);
+
+	return __ulseq_to_u64seq(ulseq);
+}
+
+static bool _prb_read_valid(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 *seq,
+			    struct printk_record *r, unsigned int *line_count);
+
+/*
+ * Check if there are records directly following @last_finalized_seq that are
+ * finalized. If so, update @last_finalized_seq to the latest of these
+ * records. It is not allowed to skip over records that are not yet finalized.
+ */
+static void desc_update_last_finalized(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
+{
+	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &rb->desc_ring;
+	u64 prev_seq = desc_last_finalized_seq(desc_ring);
+	u64 seq = prev_seq;
+
+	while (_prb_read_valid(rb, &seq, NULL, NULL)) {
+		unsigned long oldval = __u64seq_to_ulseq(prev_seq);
+		unsigned long newval = __u64seq_to_ulseq(seq);
+
+		if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&desc_ring->last_finalized_seq,
+						    &oldval, newval)) {
+			prev_seq = seq;
+		} else {
+			prev_seq = __ulseq_to_u64seq(oldval);
+		}
+
+		seq = prev_seq + 1;
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Attempt to finalize a specified descriptor. If this fails, the descriptor
  * is either already final or it will finalize itself when the writer commits.
  */
-static void desc_make_final(struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring, unsigned long id)
+static void desc_make_final(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, unsigned long id)
 {
+	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &rb->desc_ring;
 	unsigned long prev_state_val = DESC_SV(id, desc_committed);
 	struct prb_desc *d = to_desc(desc_ring, id);
 
 	atomic_long_cmpxchg_relaxed(&d->state_var, prev_state_val,
 			DESC_SV(id, desc_finalized)); /* LMM(desc_make_final:A) */
 
-	/* Best effort to remember the last finalized @id. */
-	atomic_long_set(&desc_ring->last_finalized_id, id);
+	desc_update_last_finalized(rb);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1550,7 +1613,7 @@ bool prb_reserve(struct prb_reserved_entry *e, struct printk_ringbuffer *rb,
 	 * readers. (For seq==0 there is no previous descriptor.)
 	 */
 	if (info->seq > 0)
-		desc_make_final(desc_ring, DESC_ID(id - 1));
+		desc_make_final(rb, DESC_ID(id - 1));
 
 	r->text_buf = data_alloc(rb, r->text_buf_size, &d->text_blk_lpos, id);
 	/* If text data allocation fails, a data-less record is committed. */
@@ -1643,7 +1706,7 @@ void prb_commit(struct prb_reserved_entry *e)
 	 */
 	head_id = atomic_long_read(&desc_ring->head_id); /* LMM(prb_commit:A) */
 	if (head_id != e->id)
-		desc_make_final(desc_ring, e->id);
+		desc_make_final(e->rb, e->id);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1663,12 +1726,9 @@ void prb_commit(struct prb_reserved_entry *e)
  */
 void prb_final_commit(struct prb_reserved_entry *e)
 {
-	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &e->rb->desc_ring;
-
 	_prb_commit(e, desc_finalized);
 
-	/* Best effort to remember the last finalized @id. */
-	atomic_long_set(&desc_ring->last_finalized_id, e->id);
+	desc_update_last_finalized(e->rb);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2017,33 +2077,19 @@ u64 prb_first_valid_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
 u64 prb_next_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
 {
 	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &rb->desc_ring;
-	enum desc_state d_state;
-	unsigned long id;
 	u64 seq;
 
-	/* Check if the cached @id still points to a valid @seq. */
-	id = atomic_long_read(&desc_ring->last_finalized_id);
-	d_state = desc_read(desc_ring, id, NULL, &seq, NULL);
+	seq = __ulseq_to_u64seq(atomic_long_read(&desc_ring->last_finalized_seq));
 
-	if (d_state == desc_finalized || d_state == desc_reusable) {
-		/*
-		 * Begin searching after the last finalized record.
-		 *
-		 * On 0, the search must begin at 0 because of hack#2
-		 * of the bootstrapping phase it is not known if a
-		 * record at index 0 exists.
-		 */
-		if (seq != 0)
-			seq++;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * The information about the last finalized sequence number
-		 * has gone. It should happen only when there is a flood of
-		 * new messages and the ringbuffer is rapidly recycled.
-		 * Give up and start from the beginning.
-		 */
-		seq = 0;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * Begin searching after the last finalized record.
+	 *
+	 * On 0, the search must begin at 0 because of hack#2
+	 * of the bootstrapping phase it is not known if a
+	 * record at index 0 exists.
+	 */
+	if (seq != 0)
+		seq++;
 
 	/*
 	 * The information about the last finalized @seq might be inaccurate.
@@ -2085,7 +2131,7 @@ void prb_init(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb,
 	rb->desc_ring.infos = infos;
 	atomic_long_set(&rb->desc_ring.head_id, DESC0_ID(descbits));
 	atomic_long_set(&rb->desc_ring.tail_id, DESC0_ID(descbits));
-	atomic_long_set(&rb->desc_ring.last_finalized_id, DESC0_ID(descbits));
+	atomic_long_set(&rb->desc_ring.last_finalized_seq, 0);
 
 	rb->text_data_ring.size_bits = textbits;
 	rb->text_data_ring.data = text_buf;
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
index 18cd25e489b8..3374a5a3303e 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct prb_desc_ring {
 	struct printk_info	*infos;
 	atomic_long_t		head_id;
 	atomic_long_t		tail_id;
-	atomic_long_t		last_finalized_id;
+	atomic_long_t		last_finalized_seq;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static struct printk_ringbuffer name = {							\
 		.infos		= &_##name##_infos[0],						\
 		.head_id	= ATOMIC_INIT(DESC0_ID(descbits)),				\
 		.tail_id	= ATOMIC_INIT(DESC0_ID(descbits)),				\
-		.last_finalized_id = ATOMIC_INIT(DESC0_ID(descbits)),				\
+		.last_finalized_seq = ATOMIC_INIT(0),						\
 	},											\
 	.text_data_ring = {									\
 		.size_bits	= (avgtextbits) + (descbits),					\

base-commit: a26f18f291f6c2eac6dac9faa12cc68fd1da5865
-- 
2.39.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ