[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6cba576-5b65-425a-b769-e26a2595b391@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 16:13:25 +0800
From: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight-tpdm: Correct the property name of MSR number
On 10/20/2023 2:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/10/2023 04:51, Tao Zhang wrote:
>> Correct the property name of the DSB MSR number that needs to be
>> read in TPDM driver. The right property name is
>> "qcom,dsb-msrs-num".
> Missing Fixes tag.
I will add it in the next patch.
>
>> This patch depends on patch series "Add support to configure TPDM DSB
>> subunit"
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=788353
> This is not suitable for commit msg. Dependencies are noted under ---.
>
> And how is this depending on that patch? Your buggy code was applied
> long time ago!
Yes, no need to depend on the patch series and it has been applied. I
will remove this comments
in the next patch.
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> index b25284e..97654aa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>>
>> if (drvdata && tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
>> of_property_read_u32(drvdata->dev->of_node,
>> - "qcom,dsb_msr_num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
>> + "qcom,dsb-msrs-num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
> So you never tested your DTS... We can keep asking about this but still
> testing does not happen :/
Since this new property has not been applied on the exist upstream DTS,
I tested this driver with the
local DTS. Unfortunately, the property name in the local DTS is not
updated, this is why it is not found
in the tests.
Best,
Tao
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists