linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] sched/fair: Scan cluster before scanning LLC in wake-up path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231020134130.GC33965@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:41:30 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, yu.c.chen@...el.com,
        gautham.shenoy@....com, mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, bristot@...hat.com,
        prime.zeng@...wei.com, yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
        jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxarm@...wei.com, 21cnbao@...il.com,
        kprateek.nayak@....com, wuyun.abel@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] sched/fair: Scan cluster before scanning LLC in
 wake-up path

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:33:22AM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:

> @@ -7349,8 +7373,13 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>  	 */
>  	if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) &&
>  	    (available_idle_cpu(prev) || sched_idle_cpu(prev)) &&
> -	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, prev))
> -		return prev;
> +	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, prev)) {
> +		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
> +			return prev;
> +
> +		if (cpus_share_resources(prev, target))
> +			return prev;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Allow a per-cpu kthread to stack with the wakee if the
> @@ -7377,7 +7406,11 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>  	    (available_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu)) &&
>  	    cpumask_test_cpu(recent_used_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) &&
>  	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, recent_used_cpu)) {
> -		return recent_used_cpu;
> +		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
> +			return recent_used_cpu;
> +
> +		if (cpus_share_resources(recent_used_cpu, target))
> +			return recent_used_cpu;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*

I've changed those like so:


--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7420,10 +7420,9 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct ta
 	if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) &&
 	    (available_idle_cpu(prev) || sched_idle_cpu(prev)) &&
 	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, prev)) {
-		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
-			return prev;
 
-		if (cpus_share_resources(prev, target))
+		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active) ||
+		    cpus_share_resources(prev, target))
 			return prev;
 	}
 
@@ -7452,11 +7451,11 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct ta
 	    (available_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(recent_used_cpu)) &&
 	    cpumask_test_cpu(recent_used_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) &&
 	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, recent_used_cpu)) {
-		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active))
-			return recent_used_cpu;
 
-		if (cpus_share_resources(recent_used_cpu, target))
+		if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active) ||
+		    cpus_share_resources(recent_used_cpu, target))
 			return recent_used_cpu;
+
 	}
 
 	/*