[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77666e6b-8aad-49f5-b936-ef306773f8dc@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 08:31:01 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memory-model] docs: memory-barriers: Add note on compiler
transformation and address deps
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 03:45:16PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
>
> Am 10/20/2023 um 7:56 PM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:13:34PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> > > Am 10/20/2023 um 5:24 PM schrieb Akira Yokosawa:
> > > > Hi Paul,
> > > >
> > > > On 2023/10/20 22:57, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > So if there are things that rcu_dereference.rst is missing, they do
> > > > > need to be added.
> > > > As far as I can see, there is no mention of "address dependency"
> > > > in rcu_dereference.rst.
> > > > Yes, I see the discussion in rcu_dereference.rst is all about how
> > > > not to break address dependency by proper uses of rcu_dereference()
> > > > and its friends. But that might not be obvious for readers who
> > > > followed the references placed in memory-barriers.txt.
> > > >
> > > > Using the term "address dependency" somewhere in rcu_dereference.rst
> > > > should help such readers, I guess.
> > > I think that's a good point.
> > How about the commit shown at the end of this email,
>
> I think it's very clear.
Thank you for looking it over!
> > with a Reported-by for both of you?
>
> I haven't reported anything.
I doubt that Akira would have said anything had you not initiated this
discussion. But if you would like, I can remove your Reported-by,
though I would need you to explicitly ask.
> > > > [...]
> > > > > > Thanks for the response, I started thinking my mails aren't getting through
> > > > > > again.
> > > > Jonas, FWIW, your email archived at
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1c731fdc-9383-21f2-b2d0-2c879b382687@huaweicloud.com/
> > > >
> > > > didn't reach my gmail inbox. I looked for it in the spam folder,
> > > > but couldn't find it there either.
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Thanks Akira!
> > >
> > > I wrote the gmail support a while ago, but no response.
> > >
> > > Currently no idea who to talk to... Oh well.
> > Your emails used to end up in my spam folder quite frequently, but
> > they have been coming through since you changed your email address.
>
> In return, I receive all mail from the mailing list, if is also addressed to
> me, twice.
> So it evens out, somehow? (I suspect this is a configuration error in my
> mail filters on my side though)
Too much fun!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists