linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] tty: whitespaces in descriptions corrected by replacing tabs with spaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023102251-playoff-utensil-0457@gregkh>
Date:   Sun, 22 Oct 2023 13:19:58 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Florian Eckert <fe@....tdt.de>
Cc:     Eckert.Florian@...glemail.com, jirislaby@...nel.org, pavel@....cz,
        lee@...nel.org, kabel@...nel.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
        ansuelsmth@...il.com, m.brock@...mierlo.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] tty: whitespaces in descriptions corrected by
 replacing tabs with spaces

On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 12:24:55PM +0200, Florian Eckert wrote:
> On 2023-10-21 18:28, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 01:28:07PM +0200, Florian Eckert wrote:
> > > Tabs were used in the function description, to make this look more
> > > uniform, the tabs were replaced by spaces where necessary.
> > > 
> > > While we're at it, I also replaced the 'ndashes' with simple dashes,
> > > since
> > > only those are supported by sphinx.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Florian Eckert <fe@....tdt.de>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 102
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This didn't apply cleanly as portions of this patch were already in my
> > tree, what did tree did you make it against?
> 
> I have already seen that I should add a base commit next time.
> So I made it against the master from last week.
> 
> However, I was not sure which tree to use as I am changing
> something in the tty and led subsystem-
> 
> > Anyway, I've fixed it up and taken it now.
> 
> Thank you for adopting my change and correcting my commit so that
> it can be applied cleanly.
> 
> I will not add this patch in the next series, as it is already in the
> tty-testing branch [1] from you?

That is correct, thanks!

greg k-h