| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <78f6742-af1e-4a33-a52a-b01dd69847d1@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 19:15:34 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, rajvi.jingar@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 13/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Display LPM requirements
for multiple PMCs
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023, David E. Box wrote:
> From: Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Update the substate_requirements attribute to display the requirements for
> all the PMCs on a package.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> V4 - No change
>
> V3 - Add missing submitter signoff
>
> V2 - no change
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 129 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> index 3894119d61b0..fcb0dc702aea 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int pmc_core_substate_l_sts_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> }
> DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_substate_l_sts_regs);
>
> -static void pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(struct seq_file *s)
> +static void pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(struct seq_file *s, int pmc_index)
> {
> struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
> int i, mode;
> @@ -743,68 +743,81 @@ static void pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(struct seq_file *s)
> static int pmc_core_substate_req_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> {
> struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
> - struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[PMC_IDX_MAIN];
> - const struct pmc_bit_map **maps = pmc->map->lpm_sts;
> - const struct pmc_bit_map *map;
> - const int num_maps = pmc->map->lpm_num_maps;
> - u32 sts_offset = pmc->map->lpm_status_offset;
> - u32 *lpm_req_regs = pmc->lpm_req_regs;
> - int mp;
> -
> - /* Display the header */
> - pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(s);
> -
> - /* Loop over maps */
> - for (mp = 0; mp < num_maps; mp++) {
> - u32 req_mask = 0;
> - u32 lpm_status;
> - int mode, idx, i, len = 32;
> -
> - /*
> - * Capture the requirements and create a mask so that we only
> - * show an element if it's required for at least one of the
> - * enabled low power modes
> - */
> - pmc_for_each_mode(idx, mode, pmcdev)
> - req_mask |= lpm_req_regs[mp + (mode * num_maps)];
> -
> - /* Get the last latched status for this map */
> - lpm_status = pmc_core_reg_read(pmc, sts_offset + (mp * 4));
> -
> - /* Loop over elements in this map */
> - map = maps[mp];
> - for (i = 0; map[i].name && i < len; i++) {
> - u32 bit_mask = map[i].bit_mask;
> -
> - if (!(bit_mask & req_mask))
> - /*
> - * Not required for any enabled states
> - * so don't display
> - */
> - continue;
> -
> - /* Display the element name in the first column */
> - seq_printf(s, "%30s |", map[i].name);
> -
> - /* Loop over the enabled states and display if required */
> - pmc_for_each_mode(idx, mode, pmcdev) {
> - if (lpm_req_regs[mp + (mode * num_maps)] & bit_mask)
> - seq_printf(s, " %9s |",
> - "Required");
> + u32 sts_offset;
> + u32 *lpm_req_regs;
> + int num_maps, mp, pmc_index;
> +
> + for (pmc_index = 0; pmc_index < ARRAY_SIZE(pmcdev->pmcs); ++pmc_index) {
> + struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[pmc_index];
> + const struct pmc_bit_map **maps;
> +
> + if (!pmc)
> + continue;
> +
> + maps = pmc->map->lpm_sts;
> + num_maps = pmc->map->lpm_num_maps;
> + sts_offset = pmc->map->lpm_status_offset;
> + lpm_req_regs = pmc->lpm_req_regs;
> +
> + if (!lpm_req_regs)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Display the header */
> + pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(s, pmc_index);
> +
> + /* Loop over maps */
> + for (mp = 0; mp < num_maps; mp++) {
> + u32 req_mask = 0;
> + u32 lpm_status;
> + const struct pmc_bit_map *map;
> + int mode, idx, i, len = 32;
> +
> + /*
> + * Capture the requirements and create a mask so that we only
> + * show an element if it's required for at least one of the
> + * enabled low power modes
> + */
> + pmc_for_each_mode(idx, mode, pmcdev)
> + req_mask |= lpm_req_regs[mp + (mode * num_maps)];
> +
> + /* Get the last latched status for this map */
> + lpm_status = pmc_core_reg_read(pmc, sts_offset + (mp * 4));
> +
> + /* Loop over elements in this map */
> + map = maps[mp];
> + for (i = 0; map[i].name && i < len; i++) {
> + u32 bit_mask = map[i].bit_mask;
> +
> + if (!(bit_mask & req_mask)) {
> + /*
> + * Not required for any enabled states
> + * so don't display
> + */
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Display the element name in the first column */
> + seq_printf(s, "pmc%d: %26s |", pmc_index, map[i].name);
> +
> + /* Loop over the enabled states and display if required */
> + pmc_for_each_mode(idx, mode, pmcdev) {
> + if (lpm_req_regs[mp + (mode * num_maps)] & bit_mask)
> + seq_printf(s, " %9s |",
> + "Required");
> + else
> + seq_printf(s, " %9s |", " ");
It would be better to not branch like this but alter param instead:
bool required = lpm_req_regs[...
seq_printf(s, " %9s |",
required ? "Required" : " ");
> + }
> +
> + /* In Status column, show the last captured state of this agent */
> + if (lpm_status & bit_mask)
> + seq_printf(s, " %9s |", "Yes");
> else
> seq_printf(s, " %9s |", " ");
Likewise here although I know this comes from the original.
--
i.
> +
> + seq_puts(s, "\n");
> }
> -
> - /* In Status column, show the last captured state of this agent */
> - if (lpm_status & bit_mask)
> - seq_printf(s, " %9s |", "Yes");
> - else
> - seq_printf(s, " %9s |", " ");
> -
> - seq_puts(s, "\n");
> }
> }
> -
> return 0;
> }
> DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_substate_req_regs);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists