[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81d4dd90-81e6-4048-901f-b3d5c7d35dcc@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:17:21 +0800
From: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight-tpdm: Correct the property name of MSR number
On 10/20/2023 4:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/10/2023 10:13, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> index b25284e..97654aa 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>>>>
>>>> if (drvdata && tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
>>>> of_property_read_u32(drvdata->dev->of_node,
>>>> - "qcom,dsb_msr_num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
>>>> + "qcom,dsb-msrs-num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
>>> So you never tested your DTS... We can keep asking about this but still
>>> testing does not happen :/
>> Since this new property has not been applied on the exist upstream DTS,
>> I tested this driver with the
>>
>> local DTS. Unfortunately, the property name in the local DTS is not
>> updated, this is why it is not found
> But your local DTS would not pass dtbs_check tests, so that's why I am
> saying - you never tested it on mainline kernel.
Thanks, we will add this test in the future to ensure that DTS, doc and
driver are consistent.
Best,
Tao
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists