[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27b5806f-ef15-7a90-5adc-5ee12690f2ca@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:39:40 +0530
From: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>,
<quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>, <quic_kamalw@...cinc.com>,
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] ARM: dts: qcom: Update devicetree for ADC7 rename
for QCOM PMICs
Hi Krzysztof,
On 7/9/2023 10:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/07/2023 09:28, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
>> The name "ADC7" needs to be replaced with the name "ADC5_GEN2"
>> everywhere to match the convention used for these ADC peripherals
>> on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. PMICs. Update devicetree files for
> We do not rename compatibles to match convention. Please provide proper
> rationale.
I'll avoid renaming the compatible directly, will just mark it
deprecated - but is it fine to do the other changes, for updating the
macro names used in devicetree (replacing the ADC7 macros with the ADC5
Gen2 macros)?
I do see an example of a macro change in devicetree done in this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1646388139.git.zong.li@sifive.com/.
Patch 2 here replaced some macro definitions:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/f9284873c2993a9952d9fe4f8dd5e89f20daab75.1646388139.git.zong.li@sifive.com/.
Patch 3 made the corresponding update in devicetree files:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/db92d209fa700f7da8bc8028083476fcc138d80e.1646388139.git.zong.li@sifive.com/.
From this mail, it looks like the maintainer was willing to pick them
at that time:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220315225652.CDAD1C340E8@smtp.kernel.org/,
would something similar be possible here?
Thanks,
Jishnu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists