[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9391365a-035c-4a51-aa41-e6878b6e034e@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:40:29 +0530
From: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>,
<quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>, <quic_kamalw@...cinc.com>,
<quic_jestar@...cinc.com>, <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
"Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] iio: adc: Update bindings to remove support for
ADC7 name used on QCOM PMICs
Hi Jonathan,
On 7/8/2023 8:32 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 12:58:28 +0530
> Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>> Now that usage of "ADC7" name has been replaced with usage of "ADC5
>> Gen2" name everywhere, remove all support for "ADC7" name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
>> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ properties:
>> - qcom,spmi-vadc
>> - qcom,spmi-adc5
>> - qcom,spmi-adc-rev2
>> - - qcom,spmi-adc7
>> - qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2
>>
>> reg:
>> @@ -214,9 +213,7 @@ allOf:
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> contains:
>> - enum :
>> - - qcom,spmi-adc7
>> - - qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2
>> + const: qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2
>>
>> then:
>> patternProperties:
> Hmm. Definitely can't drop support (as per comment on next patch).
> I think you should just mark it deprecated rather than remove it here but maybe
> you can drop it. Let's see what DT binding maintainers say.
>
> Jonathan
Yes, I'll mark it deprecated without removing it.
Thanks,
Jishnu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists