[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55812f75-3053-4970-bbbe-8ca563f33721@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:34:19 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Camel Guo <camel.guo@...s.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Calculate t_scl_l, t_scl_h according to
i2c spec
On 12.09.2022 10:59, Camel Guo wrote:
> Previously the duty cycle was divided equally into h_scl_l, t_scl_h.
> This makes the low period of the SCL clock in Fast Mode is only 1.25us
> which is way lower than the minimal value (1.3) specified in i2c
> specification. In order to make sure t_scl_l, t_scl_h always fullfill
> i2c specification, this commit calculates t_scl_l using this formula:
>
> t_scl_l = clk_cycle *
> ((t_low_min + (scl_clock - t_low_min - t_high_min) / 2) / scl_clock)
>
> where:
> t_low_min is the minimal value of low period of the SCL clock in us;
> t_high_min is the minimal value of high period of the SCL clock in us;
> scl_clock is converted from SCL clock frequency into us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Camel Guo <camel.guo@...s.com>
This sounds reasonable and works fine on all Exynos-based test board I
have. Feel free to add:
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> index 4a6260d04db2..72bc8adea8d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void exynos5_i2c_clr_pend_irq(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c)
> * exynos5_i2c_set_timing: updates the registers with appropriate
> * timing values calculated
> *
> - * Timing values for operation are calculated against either 100kHz
> + * Timing values for operation are calculated against 100kHz, 400kHz
> * or 1MHz controller operating frequency.
> *
> * Returns 0 on success, -EINVAL if the cycle length cannot
> @@ -330,6 +330,23 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_set_timing(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, bool hs_timings)
> *
> * Constraints: 4 <= temp, 0 <= CLK_DIV < 256, 2 <= clk_cycle <= 510
> *
> + * To split SCL clock into low, high periods appropriately, one
> + * proportion factor for each I2C mode is used, which is calculated
> + * using this formula.
> + * ```
> + * ((t_low_min + (scl_clock - t_low_min - t_high_min) / 2) / scl_clock)
> + * ```
> + * where:
> + * t_low_min is the minimal value of low period of the SCL clock in us;
> + * t_high_min is the minimal value of high period of the SCL clock in us;
> + * scl_clock is converted from SCL clock frequency into us.
> + *
> + * Below are the proportion factors for these I2C modes:
> + * t_low_min, t_high_min, scl_clock, proportion
> + * Standard Mode: 4.7us, 4.0us, 10us, 0.535
> + * Fast Mode: 1.3us, 0.6us, 2.5us, 0.64
> + * Fast-Plus Mode: 0.5us, 0.26us, 1us, 0.62
> + *
> */
> t_ftl_cycle = (readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_CONF) >> 16) & 0x7;
> temp = clkin / op_clk - 8 - t_ftl_cycle;
> @@ -343,8 +360,19 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_set_timing(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, bool hs_timings)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - t_scl_l = clk_cycle / 2;
> - t_scl_h = clk_cycle / 2;
> + /*
> + * Scale clk_cycle to get t_scl_l using the proption factors for individual I2C modes.
> + */
> + if (op_clk <= I2C_MAX_STANDARD_MODE_FREQ)
> + t_scl_l = clk_cycle * 535 / 1000;
> + else if (op_clk <= I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ)
> + t_scl_l = clk_cycle * 64 / 100;
> + else
> + t_scl_l = clk_cycle * 62 / 100;
> +
> + if (t_scl_l > 0xFF)
> + t_scl_l = 0xFF;
> + t_scl_h = clk_cycle - t_scl_l;
> t_start_su = t_scl_l;
> t_start_hd = t_scl_l;
> t_stop_su = t_scl_l;
>
> base-commit: ce888220d5c7a805e0e155302a318d5d23e62950
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists