[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJHePoayC+RUk4gCCYACRXguuXfeWFvg5cyiCwNi-YxC3-UOLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:08:49 +0500
From: Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fixed multiple typos in multiple files
Can anyone approve this patch?
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:27 AM James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 10:45 +0500, Muhammad Muzammil wrote:
> > should I create the v2 or this patch is fine?
>
> Personally, I don't think anyone cares about misspellings unless it
> obscures the meaning of the sentence, so, given the interactions in
> this thread, I'd argue the only one really worth fixing is relay ->
> relies.
>
> James
>
>
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 9:27 PM James Bottomley
> > <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 16:45 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > > > /*
> > > > > > - * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption
> > > > > > becase they never
> > > > > > + * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption
> > > > > > because they never
> > > > > > * update their counter from in-interrupt context.
> > > > > > For
> > > > > > these two
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say...
> > > > > Maybe someone else does.
> > > >
> > > > s/relay/rely/
> > >
> > > relies, surely, being the correct third person singular form of the
> > > verb to match the nominative noun "the caller".
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists