[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7goxget.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:07:38 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] wifi: ath11k: fix event locking
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org> writes:
> RCU lockdep reported suspicious RCU usage when accessing the temperature
> sensor. Inspection revealed that the DFS radar event code was also
> missing the required RCU read-side critical section marking.
>
> Johan
>
>
> Changes in v2
> - add the missing rcu_read_unlock() to an
> ath11k_wmi_pdev_temperature_event() error path as noticed by Jeff
>
>
> Johan Hovold (2):
> wifi: ath11k: fix temperature event locking
> wifi: ath11k: fix dfs radar event locking
Thanks for the fixes. I really like using lockdep_assert_held() to
document if a function requires some lock held, is there anything
similar for RCU?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists