[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mtuckinkekec6b5jolatrshnaodj7q2572itq6glfmvdf4yy2v@q2xmkhwegbnn>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 14:17:32 -0400
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@...sion.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stone.xulei@...sion.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] padata: Simplify sysfs cpumask and sequencing logic
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:06:40AM +0800, Wang Jinchao wrote:
> Utilizing the WQ_SYSFS from workqueue to support sysfs
> ======================================================
>
> Padata relies on workqueue, and since workqueue has already implemented
> support for cpumask through WQ_SYSFS, we can reuse this functionality
> and avoid redundant implementation.
> Link: https://docs.kernel.org/core-api/workqueue.html#affinity-scopes
Keeping the existing padata sysfs paths seems best, as mentioned in the
other thread.
> Using completion to ensure the sequencing of the 'serial()'
> ===========================================================
I responded in the other RFC thread.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists