[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgMVcr-ZV2m=9B=B82PmGgWDWecBvt+fMhk-Yhzk_Q5Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:00:56 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
liuwenyu <liuwenyu7@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/50] perf record: Be lazier in allocating lost
samples buffer
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 3:25 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Wait until a lost sample occurs to allocate the lost samples buffer,
> often the buffer isn't necessary. This saves a 64kb allocation and
> 5.3kb of peak memory consumption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 9b4f3805ca92..b6c8c1371b39 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -1924,21 +1924,13 @@ static void __record__save_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel,
> static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> {
> struct perf_session *session = rec->session;
> - struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost;
> + struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost = NULL;
> struct evsel *evsel;
>
> /* there was an error during record__open */
> if (session->evlist == NULL)
> return;
>
> - lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
Sorry for naively choosing the max size. :-p
It could be sizeof(*lost) + machine->id_hdr_size.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> - if (lost == NULL) {
> - pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> -
> evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
> struct xyarray *xy = evsel->core.sample_id;
> u64 lost_count;
> @@ -1961,6 +1953,14 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> }
>
> if (count.lost) {
> + if (!lost) {
> + lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
> + if (!lost) {
> + pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> + }
> __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost,
> x, y, count.lost, 0);
> }
> @@ -1968,9 +1968,18 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> }
>
> lost_count = perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(evsel);
> - if (lost_count)
> + if (lost_count) {
> + if (!lost) {
> + lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
> + if (!lost) {
> + pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> + }
> __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, 0, 0, lost_count,
> PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF);
> + }
> }
> out:
> free(lost);
> --
> 2.42.0.758.gaed0368e0e-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists