linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] energy_model: use a fixed reference frequency

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 14:54:27 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@....com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        lenb@...nel.org, robert.moore@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
        ionela.voinescu@....com, pierre.gondois@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        conor.dooley@...rochip.com, suagrfillet@...il.com,
        ajones@...tanamicro.com, lftan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] energy_model: use a fixed reference frequency

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 13:55, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 06:25:38PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > The last item of a performance domain is not always the performance point
> > that has been used to compute CPU's capacity. This can lead to different
> > target frequency compared with other part of the system like schedutil and
> > would result in wrong energy estimation.
> >
> > A new arch_scale_freq_ref() is available to return a fixed and coherent
> > frequency reference that can be used when computing the CPU's frequency
> > for an level of utilization. Use this function to get this reference
> > frequency.
> >
> > Energy model is never used without defining arch_scale_freq_ref() but
> > can be compiled. Define a default arch_scale_freq_ref() returning 0
> > in such case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> > Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> >
> > ---
> >  include/linux/energy_model.h | 14 +++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> > index b9caa01dfac4..1b0c8490d4bd 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> > @@ -204,6 +204,14 @@ struct em_perf_state *em_pd_get_efficient_state(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
> >       return ps;
> >  }
> >
> > +#ifndef arch_scale_freq_ref
> > +static __always_inline
> > +unsigned int arch_scale_freq_ref(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> Hmm, did I not see the exact same thing in cpufreq.h two patches ago?

Probably, this has been added because of error returned by some
allyes/randconfig on x86

>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives