[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAb-9VcNKNf1HJOi83STrC_eNRD1Qf0Ra2fm6qspqme7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 14:58:24 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
lenb@...nel.org, robert.moore@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
ionela.voinescu@....com, pierre.gondois@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, conor.dooley@...rochip.com,
suagrfillet@...il.com, ajones@...tanamicro.com, lftan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] cpufreq/cppc: set the frequency used for computing
the capacity
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 14:52, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 06:25:39PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Save the frequency associated to the performance that has been used when
> > initializing the capacity of CPUs.
> > Also, cppc cpufreq driver can register an artificial energy model. In such
> > case, it needs the frequency for this compute capacity.
> > We moved and renamed cppc_perf_to_khz and cppc_perf_to_khz to use them
> > outside cppc_cpufreq in topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 15 +++-
> > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 141 ++++++---------------------------
> > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 2 +
> > 4 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
>
> Perhaps split this patch into code movement and actual change for ease
> of review? As in, I'm having trouble finding the actual changes ;-)
yes, I can split it.
The actual change is located in drivers/base/arch_topology.c
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists