[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fde7ffdd-4d12-4821-ac51-e67e65637111@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:31:07 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ajay Kaher <akaher@...are.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/paravirt: move some functions and defines to
alternative
On 25.10.23 12:34, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:15:16AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> +/* Low-level backend functions usable from alternative code replacements. */
>> +DEFINE_ASM_FUNC(x86_nop, "", .entry.text);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_nop);
>
> This is all x86 code so you don't really need the "x86_" prefix - "nop"
> is perfectly fine.
There is
#define nop() asm volatile ("nop")
in arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h already.
>
>> +noinstr void x86_BUG(void)
>> +{
>> + BUG();
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_BUG);
>
> That export is needed for?
>
> Paravirt stuff in modules?
>
> It builds here without it - I guess I need to do an allmodconfig.
>
It might not be needed now, but are you sure we won't need it in future?
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3099 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists